On April 17, 2026, a grand jury issued a subpoena to the Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections (BRE) to appear in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Georgia on May 5, 2026.

Department of Justice prosecutors obtain a grand jury subpoena by preparing it in connection with an active grand jury investigation and issuing it under the grand jury’s authority.

In this case, the subpoena requests that the Fulton County BRE bring specific documents and electronically stored information.  That information includes information regarding election staff/members who served in the November 2020 General Election.  The records must identify their name, position/function, residential and email addresses, and personal telephone numbers.

The records include those who were performing the following functions and duties:

• Individuals assigned to review Mail-In Ballots
• Individuals assigned to the Voter Review Panel/Board
• Individuals assigned to Mobile Voting Locations
• Individuals assigned to transfer results to or from media or transport ballots, ballot stock, or media
• Individuals employed or contracted by the Fulton Board of Registrations and Elections
• Individuals who worked or volunteered for the Risk Limiting Audit
• Individuals who worked or volunteered for the Recount
• Individuals who served as precinct managers and assistant managers

Many of these individuals could potentially have pertinent information about numerous anomalies uncovered over the last several years.  The Gateway Pundit has previously reported that Fulton County did not properly perform signature verification on mail-in ballots in Fulton County, according to testimony under oath from then-Fulton County BRE member Mark Wingate during the disbarment hearing for former Deputy Attorney General Jeff Clark.

Wingate also testified that he was prevented from viewing chain of custody documents prior to certifying the 2020 election.  Both issues could potentially be explored with the above witnesses.

THERE IT IS.

Testimony today, under oath, from Fulton County Registrations and Elections Board Member Mark Wingate.

Fani Willis now KNOWS that NO signature verification was done in Fulton. That 147,000 ballots that, BY LAW, are invalid.

This influence NOT JUST THE… pic.twitter.com/4J8KwAVi8V

— CannCon (@canncon) April 2, 2024

The Gateway Pundit also reported that the risk-limiting audit performed in Fulton County was subject to intense scrutiny from the UC Berkeley professor who invented the Risk Limiting Audit, Dr. Philip Stark.  In Curling v. Raffensperger, he submitted a sworn declaration that criticized hundreds of thousands of missing ballot images that would make it impossible to perform a valid risk-limiting audit.

The Gateway Pundit covered many of these anomalies in this four-part series (parts 1 thru 3 linked here).

The grand jury subpoena was submitted on April 17, 2026, but was not known until a motion to quash the subpoena was filed by Fulton County attorney Y. Soo Jo, in conjunction with Abbe Lowell and Norm Eisen, among others.

The motion to quash calls the subpoena the DOJ’s “latest effort to target and harass the President’s perceived political enemies” as he “perpetuates his false claim that they ‘stole’ the 2020 election.”

The motion further states that the subpoena is “unprecedented and harassing” and would identify “thousands of Fulton County election workers and volunteers.”

“It cannot yield any evidence that could result in a criminal prosecution,” citing the statute of limitations for any purported 2020 election crimes.

However, the subpoena is from a grand jury, and not an administrative or judicial subpoena.  A grand jury typically consists of 16 to 23 citizens empaneled to determine whether probable cause exists, based on evidence, to indict or to compel testimony or documents under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 17.

Grand jury subpoenas typically enjoy broad investigative latitude and impose a heavy burden on recipients to quash.

You can read the grand jury subpoena here:

Skip to PDF content

Skip to PDF content

You can read the Motion to Quash here:

Skip to PDF content

Skip to PDF content

The DOJ is still awaiting a response from the District Court in a lawsuit filed to claw back the election records acquired through a search warrant in January.  The latest ruling required the DOJ to submit responses to questions from the petitioner, including when the criminal investigation was referred to the FBI, when the FBI opened the investigation, and when the DOJ first began drafting the affidavit.

In the below post, the judge ordered the DOJ to respond to numbers 1, 2, and 4.

NEWS: In Fulton County’s suit seeking return of 2020 election materials, Judge Boulee partially GRANTS the county’s motion to compel further information from DOJ.

DOJ must answer questions one, two, and four — including when the FBI opened its investigation. pic.twitter.com/lnpYcm2GdH

— Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) April 30, 2026

The post DOJ Issues Grand Jury Subpoenas For ALL 2020 Election Workers Records from Fulton County appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.